Athletico Easthamico 12:02 Fri Sep 1
Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
|
Hughie, eerrr righto....
A senior source close to the club has revealed the true investment this summer spending insisting claimed transfer fees received this summer or wages released have often been inflated in media reports while inbound wages of new players were often under estimated.
Given the chance to reveal the true figures the senior source revealed:
Summer Spending Inbound
Pablo Zabelta Free Transfer on wages £70,000 per week
Joe Hart Season long loan on wages of £100,000 per week
Marko Arnautovic £25m with add ons on wages of £65,000 per week
Javier Hernandez £16m transfer fee on wages of £135,000 per week
Total Spend £31m Wages of £370,000 per week or £19.24m per year
Summer Outbound dealings
Havard Norveit Transfer fee £4m received Wages of £40,000 per week released
Darren Randolph Transfer fee £5m received Wages of £20,000 per week released
Ashley Fletcher Transfer Fee of £4m received Wages of £16,000 per week released
Robert Snodgrass £1m loan fee means all the £50,000 per week wages is released
Gokhan Tore End of loan releasing £40,000 per week of wages released
Jonathan Calleri End of loan £40,000 per week of wages released
Sofiane Feghouli £3.8m Transfer Fee received Wages of £60,000 per week released
Enner Valencia £5m Transfer fee received Wages of £40,000 per week released
Alvaro Arbeloa Retired at end of contract Wages of £55,000 per week released
Transfer Fees in = £21.8m
Outgoing wages released £361,000 per week or £18.77m per year
Net transfer Spend totals £19.2m
Net increase of player wages of £59,000 per week this summer or £3m per year
|
|
|
Replies - In Chronological Order ( Show Newest Messages First)
twoleftfeet
12:08 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
I don't care!
I wanted Carvalho, Van Dijk and Llorente
I didn't want excuses!
|
Iron Duke
12:09 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
Maths isn't his strong point then
|
Nagel
12:11 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
31m - 21.8m fees doesn't equal 19.2m net spend.
19.24m - 18.77m doesn't equal 3m rise in wages.
|
Megatron
12:11 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
Good news is there is plenty of money for the next manager to spend in January, to keep us up.
|
aldgate
12:12 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
Even with this spin through their favourite mouth organ the owners have still kept about £100m of this year's TV money .....
|
Nagel
12:14 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
Oh, the 31m should read 41m (25m + 16m). Not sure about the wages.
|
Crassus
12:15 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
Let see the cost of relegation then Hugh - you pissed cunt, go ask that
They have bought inadequately, paid excessively and after all that twaddle claim a net spend, with the Terry Brown calculater found in a desk, a £19m spend - well get this fucking Bournmouth spent more on a Chelsea reserve and that excludes his wages
That is the level we are at - second division where we are heading
|
RichyP
12:19 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
What about the other 8 players who have left or gone out on loan? They weren't first team but at the same time they would have been drawing down a wage
|
PanasonicHeadphone
12:25 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
A "net spend" of Britt Assombalonga + change.
Top bombing.
|
Robson
12:28 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
Those figures are pretty much exactly what everyone's been reporting/speculating, so confirming them is hardly a defence of the club's spending policy.
Still, 10 minutes to go before the window shuts. Fingers crossed...
|
Takashi Miike
12:32 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
"who can we get to limit the moaning and general disappointment? I know, that reformed alco cunt Southon"
spin baby spin
|
Sniper
12:36 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
Was here not a loan fee for hart as well? If so, just makes that deal all the more ludicrous
As does the sale of feghouli - we for duck all for our players according to this
Strange how all the outgoing g deals were less than stated but the incoming ones weren't - are you seriously trying to tell me that the arnautovic deal doesn't include any add on what we won't ever pay?
What a load of spinning shite
|
Alex V
5:02 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
Interesting figures - seem genuine. Missing the signing fees for Zabaleta and Hart, but I can understand why the club wouldn't want to reveal those.
I'd like to know what happened with that dispute with Feghouli - did we pay up on the £3m or not?
|
Your mum
7:37 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
100 per week on a keeper that wasn't a priority is dereliction of duty..
|
LeroysBoots
7:55 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
So Fucking what ?
They still pretended they wanted Carvalho...there was a cost to that !
|
chedylan 2
8:21 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
So one in one out is it?
Snodgrass and feghouli gone and no one in.
And sakho may as well have.
It looks to me they don't want to give bilic anymore money to spend because they likely will get rid soon
Perfect for them the pair of fucking delboy cunts.
|
One Word
9:52 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
How does the £79m received from Sky fit in ?
|
bowboy
10:03 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
Should that be 9.2m not 19.2m or am I missimg something.
|
Leeshere
10:06 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
Net spend of £9.2m and a wage increase of £9k per week?
|
Iron2010
10:10 Fri Sep 1
Re: Transfer spending explained in detail.
|
I find it hard to believe that the Arnie transfer was a straight 25. A common theme is over stating the money we pay out whilst talking down the money that we receive.
|
| 
